• WisPolitics

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

 9:18 PM 

Petrowski, Seidel bicker over bipartisanship, women's issues, mining

State Reps. Jerry Petrowski and Donna Seidel harshly criticized each others' bipartisan credentials during a debate Wednesday evening at UW-Marathon County.

The candidates in the 29th Senate District's recall election next month each vowed to work across party lines and find solutions for the district and touted their experience in that capacity during their respective Assembly careers.

But Seidel, D-Wausau, said Petrowski had enabled a "divide and conquer" agenda by the Walker administration and GOP leaders.

Petrowski, R-Marathon, fired back at what he described as the overly negative tone of Seidel's campaign.

Seidel said she had a proven record on jobs issues from her time in Assembly leadership in the 2009-10 session and said Dems went to the newly elected Gov. Scott Walker early this session with proposals to help the state create jobs.

"Jerry, 'Mr. Bipartisanship,' did nothing to convince his colleagues to consider any one of those bills," Seidel charged.

Petrowski, R-Marathon, said just one Dem jobs bill went across his desk as chairman of the Assembly Transportation Committee and that he took up the bill and moved it forward.

Although that measure ultimately failed to pass, Petrowski said, "I listen to the other side; if they have good ideas, I incorporate them into the bill."

Petrowski also charged back that "Donna's idea of working together is slam someone on TV to the tune of $100,000."

Petrowski said the Seidel campaign's ads "trying to tear me apart" on women's health issues were inaccurate. He said Seidel, in fact, voted to cut funding for well woman screenings in the 2009 state budget.

"That's what's wrong with politics today," Petrowski said.

Seidel declared that she had long championed the program, and that the 2009 vote was part of an across-the-board cut in light of a budget shortfall.

She blasted Petrowski over a provision cutting state funding for Planned Parenthood, including for the group's cancer screening services, arguing it showed "a lack of interest or concern for the health care of so many women in this state."

Seidel also called the fiscal policies enacted by Republicans last year "really misguided decisions, and we have see the result of those decisions,” referring to statistics showing the state ranking No. 50 nationally in job creation.

She said public employees should have their collective bargaining rights restored -- with the concessions she said were agreed to during last winter's protests over the budget repair bill -- and education should not have been "first place to cut."

Petrowski said those decisions enabled the state to get on an "even keel" financially, and said a number of economic factors, from unemployment to revenue projections, "shows you that we are going in the right direction."

He did say, however, that he would vote against so-called "right to work" legislation after video surfaced of Walker discussing that issue with a donor last year.

"I don't believe there is a plan to do that," Petrowski said. "I would vote no, and I don't believe there is support to do it."

Seidel responded that, in light of Petrowski's vote for public sector collective bargaining restrictions, "I find it pretty hard to imagine that that is honest."

She reiterated that public employee unions had indicated they would accept higher pension and health care contributions as debate on the repair bill raged, telling Petrowski, "You could not accept 'yes' for an answer."

The candidates also went at it over mining legislation

Seidel defended her opposition to "the most extreme mining bill," saying she wanted to be sure that air and water quality in the state's northern frontier would be protected.

"When I can get those assurances, then absolutely I will be committed 100 percent to creating those good paying jobs," Seidel said.

Petrowski said the proposed iron mine amounted to "running a big shovel" through the mining site, and that it would not be an air quality issue.

Instead, Petrowski said that the only reason the bill failed was Dems "did not want to see Scott Walker have a win on the mining issue."

-- By Andy Szal


Back to Election Blog main page

: See newer blog items : : See older blog items :

Election Blog site feed

wispolitics.com Social News

Follow Us


Updates from WisPolitics.com on primary and general elections in Wisconsin.

Editor: JR Ross
Reporters: Chris Thompson, David Wise

· Election Blog site feed


· Campaign ads
· Audio archive
· Government Accountability Board (state elections)
· Federal Election Commission (federal elections)


· February 2007
· April 2007
· February 2008
· March 2008
· April 2008
· September 2008
· October 2008
· November 2008
· February 2009
· April 2009
· February 2010
· March 2010
· April 2010
· September 2010
· November 2010
· February 2011
· March 2011
· April 2011
· May 2011
· June 2011
· July 2011
· August 2011
· September 2011
· October 2011
· November 2011
· December 2011
· January 2012
· February 2012
· March 2012
· April 2012
· May 2012
· June 2012
· July 2012
· August 2012
· September 2012
· October 2012
· November 2012
· December 2012
· January 2013
· February 2013
· March 2013
· April 2013
· June 2013
· July 2013
· August 2013
· September 2013
· October 2013
· November 2013
· December 2013
· January 2014
· February 2014
· March 2014
· April 2014
· May 2014
· June 2014
· July 2014
· August 2014
· September 2014
· October 2014
· November 2014
· December 2014
· January 2015
· February 2015
· March 2015
· April 2015
· May 2015
· June 2015
· July 2015
· August 2015
· September 2015
· October 2015
· November 2015
· December 2015
· January 2016
· February 2016
· March 2016
· April 2016
· May 2016
· June 2016
· July 2016
· August 2016
· September 2016
· October 2016
· November 2016
· December 2016
· January 2017
· February 2017
Copyright ©2012 WisPolitics.com All rights reserved. | WisOpinion.com | WisBusiness.com  |  Website development by wisnet.com LLC  | Website design by Makin’ Hey Communications