• WisPolitics


Thursday, March 7, 2013

 10:27 PM 

Fallone says court dysfunctional, Roggensack says opponent attacking court


Supreme Court candidate Ed Fallone accused incumbent Justice Patience Roggensack of downplaying the "the dysfunction on the court" in her campaign during a debate taped Thursday for Wisconsin Public TV’s “Here and Now.”

Roggensack fired back that the Marquette Law professor is running an entirely negative campaign and that she takes exception what she called his insulting of the entire court.

"You're attacking the court. The court is not up for re-election," Roggensack said during the debate, which is set to air Friday night.

She questioned how Fallone could "call the court names" throughout the state, then hope to work with the other six justices should he win the April 2 election.

Fallone, who participated from Milwaukee while Roggensack was in WPT’s Madison studio, countered that he is the lone candidate in the race taking the issue seriously following a physical altercation between Justices David Prosser and Ann Walsh Bradley in 2011.

"It seems as if you're trying to sweep under the rug a serious situation on the court," Fallone said.

Roggensack said the court was not dysfunctional -- arguing, "We’re doing a good job on the cases that we have" -- and that the justices have not seen an inappropriate confrontation since the Prosser-Bradley incident.

She did concede, however, that she is concerned about the public's perception of the court, defending a letter she drafted in the aftermath of the 2011 incident as a potential start to the healing process.

"We have a lot of repair work to do for the court as an institution, and that's what I was trying to get started," Roggensack said.

She said the letter would have showed the public that the justices acknowledge the "totally inappropriate" nature of the altercation, and that the justices had to take the issue upon themselves after recusals stalled a Wisconsin Judicial Commission complaint on the incident filed against Prosser.

Roggensack vowed that if re-elected, she would seek to start the process again after the spring election.

Fallone said that Roggensack did not have to recuse herself from the discipline case and that the recusals overall undermined the Judicial Commission process.

He called the letter "a poor second-best," saying it would not have assigned responsibility for the altercation.

"There's not accountability, and we're stuck in limbo,” Fallone said of the high court recusals in the case.

Roggensack defended her decision not to participate, saying that her role in the incident was "upsetting" and that she would not have been "a fair and unbiased decision maker."

"I hold myself more accountable than perhaps you would like to," Roggensack said.

In addition to agreeing that public perception of the court needed work, the candidates each said they'd recuse themselves in cases that involved campaign contributions that could create the perception of unfairness.

But the candidates sparred over the recusal process itself, with Fallone saying Roggensack helped change recusal standards to open the door "wider than ever to special interest money."

Roggensack said that decision simply clarified previous court policy established in a case presided over by then-Justice Louis Butler.

"The court decided as a whole that accepting a lawful contribution, if there was nothing else … was no reason for him to get off the case," Roggensack said.

See more information on "Here and Now" broadcast.
 
-- By Andy Szal


Back to Election Blog main page

: See newer blog items : : See older blog items :

Election Blog site feed
Advertisement
Advertisement

wispolitics.com Social News

Follow Us

ABOUT THE BLOG

Updates from WisPolitics.com on primary and general elections in Wisconsin.

Editor: JR Ross
Reporters: Chris Thompson, David Wise

· Election Blog site feed

ELECTION LINKS

· Campaign ads
· Audio archive
· Government Accountability Board (state elections)
· Federal Election Commission (federal elections)

ARCHIVE

· February 2007
· April 2007
· February 2008
· March 2008
· April 2008
· September 2008
· October 2008
· November 2008
· February 2009
· April 2009
· February 2010
· March 2010
· April 2010
· September 2010
· November 2010
· February 2011
· March 2011
· April 2011
· May 2011
· June 2011
· July 2011
· August 2011
· September 2011
· October 2011
· November 2011
· December 2011
· January 2012
· February 2012
· March 2012
· April 2012
· May 2012
· June 2012
· July 2012
· August 2012
· September 2012
· October 2012
· November 2012
· December 2012
· January 2013
· February 2013
· March 2013
· April 2013
· June 2013
· July 2013
· August 2013
· September 2013
· October 2013
· November 2013
· December 2013
· January 2014
· February 2014
· March 2014
· April 2014
· May 2014
· June 2014
· July 2014
· August 2014
· September 2014
· October 2014
· November 2014
· December 2014
· January 2015
· February 2015
· March 2015
· April 2015
· May 2015
· June 2015
· July 2015
· August 2015
· September 2015
· October 2015
· November 2015
· December 2015
· January 2016
· February 2016
· March 2016
· April 2016
· May 2016
· June 2016
· July 2016
· August 2016
· September 2016
· October 2016
· November 2016
· December 2016
Copyright ©2012 WisPolitics.com All rights reserved. | WisOpinion.com | WisBusiness.com  |  Website development by wisnet.com LLC  | Website design by Makin’ Hey Communications