• WisPolitics

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

 8:29 AM 

Kloppenburg, Bradley clash over Bradley leaving oral arguments early

Supreme Court Justice Rebecca Bradley and her challenger, Appeals Judge JoAnne Kloppenburg, traded jabs Tuesday over the incumbent leaving oral arguments early.

The question arose during the Dane County Bar Association's candidate forum in Madison ahead of the April 5 election. Bradley and Kloppenburg covered the familiar territory of Bradley's college writings on gay people and AIDS as well as allegations Kloppenburg is soft on crime.

But when the questions turned to Bradley's recently leaving oral arguments to deliver a speech to Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce, the two candidates couldn't even agree on how much of the arguments she missed. Bradley said 10 minutes and Kloppenburg estimated 15 to 20.

Either way, Kloppenburg said, she has never seen it happen in 23 years.

"It is a dereliction of duty, and it is an affront to attorneys who have spent so much time preparing for oral argument," she said, "and to the parties who are left feeling, 'Did they get a fair shake?'"

Bradley has insisted she missed nothing. She said she had read the briefs and had all of her questions answered by the time she left. She said she then watched the rest on WisconsinEye.

Furthermore, Bradley said, in her five months on the bench since Gov. Scott Walker appointed her, she has seen justices arrive late and leave early for oral arguments.

"We all try to avoid having to miss any part of oral arguments or any other aspect of our responsibilities as Supreme Court justices," she said. "But the fact remains that my fellow colleagues occasionally miss portions of oral argument as well."

Justice Ann Walsh Bradley left oral arguments early last year to give a speech during her re-election campaign.

Still, Kloppenburg said, it's not simply a matter of having questions answered and then leaving. The back and forth between justices and attorneys during oral arguments is designed to lead to additional questions and different ways of framing a case, she said.

"It sure seems to someone in the legal community that someone who leaves the bench for a nonemergency reason during oral argument already made up her mind," Kloppenburg said.

But Bradley shot back that the real decision-making takes place after oral arguments, when the justices meet around a conference table and share their opinions on the case.

"With all due respect to Judge Kloppenburg, she just doesn't know what she's talking about when it comes to the oral arguments, the process by which the Supreme Court decides cases," she said. "She doesn't have the experience of sitting on the Wisconsin Supreme Court."

Bradley today also placed a value of a "million dollars-plus" on what the liberal One Wisconsin Now has given to Kloppenburg's campaign.

The justice used the amount when discussing Kloppenburg's criticism of those who support Bradley's campaign. Bradley said she could say the same about those who support Kloppenburg, adding OWN Executive Director Scot Ross uses "hateful" and "disgusting" language on social media and is demeaning to women with whom he disagrees.

"One Wisconsin Now has provided, I would put at, million dollars-plus in the value of what they provided to my opponent's campaign," Bradley said.

Kloppenburg disagreed and called the allegation inappropriate.

"One Wisconsin Now has absolutely no connection to my campaign," she said, "and my opponent can identify none."

Ross, whose group brought to light Bradley's college writings on gay people and those with AIDS, fired back at the justice today.

"Rebecca Bradley is clearly unhappy the media across Wisconsin are covering the hateful and hurtful things that she wrote," he said.

The candidates also touched on the possibility of an amendment to the state constitution that would require justices serve one 16-year term on the Supreme Court.

Bradley said that's a decision for lawmakers and the people of the state, though she joked about what some might expect her response to be.

"I think as people have seen how this campaign has gone for me," she said, "I might be somebody who's in favor of making changes to methods of judicial selection."

Kloppenburg said she understands the idea that such an amendment could help the state have "more fair judicial elections."

"But even that proposal doesn't account for the injection of millions of dollars by unregulated special interests that don't have to disclose their donors," she said.

Listen to the forum:

Back to Election Blog main page

: See newer blog items : : See older blog items :

Election Blog site feed

wispolitics.com Social News

Follow Us


Updates from WisPolitics.com on primary and general elections in Wisconsin.

Editor: JR Ross
Reporters: Chris Thompson, David Wise

· Election Blog site feed


· Campaign ads
· Audio archive
· Government Accountability Board (state elections)
· Federal Election Commission (federal elections)


· February 2007
· April 2007
· February 2008
· March 2008
· April 2008
· September 2008
· October 2008
· November 2008
· February 2009
· April 2009
· February 2010
· March 2010
· April 2010
· September 2010
· November 2010
· February 2011
· March 2011
· April 2011
· May 2011
· June 2011
· July 2011
· August 2011
· September 2011
· October 2011
· November 2011
· December 2011
· January 2012
· February 2012
· March 2012
· April 2012
· May 2012
· June 2012
· July 2012
· August 2012
· September 2012
· October 2012
· November 2012
· December 2012
· January 2013
· February 2013
· March 2013
· April 2013
· June 2013
· July 2013
· August 2013
· September 2013
· October 2013
· November 2013
· December 2013
· January 2014
· February 2014
· March 2014
· April 2014
· May 2014
· June 2014
· July 2014
· August 2014
· September 2014
· October 2014
· November 2014
· December 2014
· January 2015
· February 2015
· March 2015
· April 2015
· May 2015
· June 2015
· July 2015
· August 2015
· September 2015
· October 2015
· November 2015
· December 2015
· January 2016
· February 2016
· March 2016
· April 2016
· May 2016
· June 2016
· July 2016
· August 2016
· September 2016
· October 2016
· November 2016
· December 2016
· January 2017
· February 2017
Copyright ©2012 WisPolitics.com All rights reserved. | WisOpinion.com | WisBusiness.com  |  Website development by wisnet.com LLC  | Website design by Makin’ Hey Communications