• WisPolitics


Wednesday, October 12, 2016

 4:57 PM 

Judge: Voter ID likely to stay in place for November election, but more aggressive approach needed to help voters

The state’s voter ID law is likely to stay in place this November, though U.S. Judge James Peterson is calling for “more aggressive outreach” to voters who struggle meeting its requirements.

At a court hearing today, Peterson slammed the state for its handling of the voter ID law, saying its training of DMV employees was “manifestly inadequate” and that the issues that popped up in recent weeks were predictable. And he raised major concerns that the information DMV provides on its website remains far too complex. 

“There’s still a real failure to communicate in simple terms what you need to do to get an ID if you don’t have a birth certificate,” Peterson said. “This isn’t really rocket level science stuff here.” 

But Peterson signaled he won’t block the state’s voter ID law, saying he’s not sure he has the authority to do so. He scheduled a meeting tomorrow morning to draft a remedy to the issues raised in court today. 

The hearing today followed the release of audio recordings from the group VoteRiders that showed some DMV employees gave people the wrong information about the state’s ID petition process. 

That process, also known as the IDPP, lets people get a temporary receipt they can use at the polls if they struggle submitting the proper documents to get a permanent voter ID. 

Peterson said he wants to respect the state’s desire to have a voter ID law, which he said is likely constitutional under current law. But the state “really needs to step up” to ensure people understand the IDPP, which he said is a “prerequisite to a constitutionally sound voter ID law.” 

Per Peterson’s request, the state on Friday filed information on its investigation into the recordings and whether the roughly 400 DMV field employees have the proper training. DOJ attorney Mike Murphy said the DMV has “taken a lot of steps” to make sure its employees are trained adequately, pointing to the new online modules they were required to complete and the necessary follow-ups with their supervisors.

But Peterson countered that should’ve been happening at the outset. He said the recordings and DMV’s follow-up action were another example of a “disturbing pattern” in which the state only takes steps once issues pop up, saying the state “doesn’t actively anticipate problems.” 

“Many businesses that have to train customer service people do that first. … This is a matter of routine in businesses all over the country,” Peterson said. 

The state’s investigation also concluded media reports about the recordings were exaggerated.

One example, Murphy said, is that several of the recordings highlighted were VoteRiders volunteers or employees who asked DMV employees hypothetical questions that were likely to trip up the employees.

Only four of the cases submitted by the plaintiffs represented people actually seeking information on what to do, and those were all resolved successfully, he said. 

“That is not a description of a system that is fundamentally broken,” Murphy said. 

But Peterson said during its investigation the state also didn’t send in actual voters in its spot checks of 31 DMV stations. The state instead sent undercover troopers, and Peterson said though they “went in with the easy cases,” the information they got still wasn’t flawless. Peterson said he worried about an elderly person going to the DMV alone with a more challenging case.

-- By Polo Rocha


Back to Election Blog main page

: See newer blog items : : See older blog items :

Election Blog site feed
Advertisement
Advertisement

wispolitics.com Social News

Follow Us

ABOUT THE BLOG

Updates from WisPolitics.com on primary and general elections in Wisconsin.

Editor: JR Ross
Reporters: Chris Thompson, David Wise

· Election Blog site feed

ELECTION LINKS

· Campaign ads
· Audio archive
· Government Accountability Board (state elections)
· Federal Election Commission (federal elections)

ARCHIVE

· February 2007
· April 2007
· February 2008
· March 2008
· April 2008
· September 2008
· October 2008
· November 2008
· February 2009
· April 2009
· February 2010
· March 2010
· April 2010
· September 2010
· November 2010
· February 2011
· March 2011
· April 2011
· May 2011
· June 2011
· July 2011
· August 2011
· September 2011
· October 2011
· November 2011
· December 2011
· January 2012
· February 2012
· March 2012
· April 2012
· May 2012
· June 2012
· July 2012
· August 2012
· September 2012
· October 2012
· November 2012
· December 2012
· January 2013
· February 2013
· March 2013
· April 2013
· June 2013
· July 2013
· August 2013
· September 2013
· October 2013
· November 2013
· December 2013
· January 2014
· February 2014
· March 2014
· April 2014
· May 2014
· June 2014
· July 2014
· August 2014
· September 2014
· October 2014
· November 2014
· December 2014
· January 2015
· February 2015
· March 2015
· April 2015
· May 2015
· June 2015
· July 2015
· August 2015
· September 2015
· October 2015
· November 2015
· December 2015
· January 2016
· February 2016
· March 2016
· April 2016
· May 2016
· June 2016
· July 2016
· August 2016
· September 2016
· October 2016
· November 2016
· December 2016
Copyright ©2012 WisPolitics.com All rights reserved. | WisOpinion.com | WisBusiness.com  |  Website development by wisnet.com LLC  | Website design by Makin’ Hey Communications